There are a
great many folks in this age that are grasping for self-sufficiency. Some want it for the health of the
earth. Some want it for the health of
their family. Some want it for security
against an ominous collapse they see on the near horizon of our society. Some want it for the sheer freedom that it
gives.
The
majority who seek self-sufficiency do so in a strange manner. They seem to think that the machine can give
them independence. “If only I could
afford a tractor, then I could really farm,” they seem to say.
To seek
self-sufficiency through the machine is self-refuting. Unless a man’s land has both oil and ore
underneath, and unless he has the skills to obtain and refine the oil, mine the
ore and forge it into cogs and pistons and all the plethora that go into a
tractor, he has not made much of a step toward self-sufficiency.
To rely on
the machine is not to rely on self, but on a complex web-work of commerce that
can only exist under the current, rotten, global economic system.
This is
true of so many forms of luxury technology that we have come to depend on. “Green energy” requires at the very least a
rather complex battery wall system that must be replaced every few years. Unless you can make your own deep-cycle
batteries, transformers, generators, wind turbines, and solar panels, you are
dependent. The car that we take for
granted as we drive to the store to purchase the necessary tools for our
self-reliance is itself a complex system of parts that we can neither produce
nor maintain without that complex economic system that has caught the whole
world in its net.
To be truly
self-reliant would require tremendous changes in our way of life.
The car and
the tractor would have to be replaced with draft animals or human labor – many
farmers of the past and present have not the resources to acquire or maintain
animals to work for them and must subsist solely by the sweat of their own
brow.
The forced
air furnace or outdoor boiler would have to be replaced by open fireplaces,
woodstoves, or masonry heaters. Such
radiant heat sources would drastically change the way we plan our houses – not
to mention their size. And there would
be no chainsaws to cut all that wood with…
The
electric lights would have to be replaced with oil lamps or candles – unless
you have the means to build and maintain a natural gas well and line and a way
to pressurize it without electricity.
Indoor
plumbing with pressurized and heated water would have to go. The computer, internet, telephone,
television and radio would all have to go.
Let us not go into all the factory-made materials that make up our
houses, furniture, clothing and the like.
Lest you
think this is the abstract rambling of a disinterested philosopher, it would
mean saying goodbye to my electric potter’s wheel, kiln, and factory-mixed clay
and glazes. Clay would have to be dug
from the yard (we do have clay enough for this, but it is likely less than
ideal for throwing on the wheel) and slaked and wedged and all the
labor-intensive process that goes into preparing dirt to become pottery. I would have to build either a pit kiln or a
wood-fired kiln and work either with more primitive forms of sealants like terrasigilatta
or simpler wood ash glazes. The
woodshop would look drastically different.
All the power tools would have to be replaced by hand tools and skill
and even the beloved sawmill would have to go as it runs on gas.
We are so
far removed from independence that we don’t know what it would mean to be
free. And yet there is a longing in the
depths of many a shackled soul for that freedom befitting man made in the image
of God. The longing does not count the
cost. It begins to pull at the yoke of
slavery under which it has toiled without joy many long years. It strains against that yoke in hope. In the hope that the yoke can be broken by
what strength is left in man.
I am no
fool. Well, time will only tell whether
I am or am not a fool. But I am not so
foolish as to think that any of this can possibly be easy or can even be
attained in the course of one man’s life.
I have little hope of gaining true independence for myself. And yet I must labor in a hope that does not
fail, that cannot fail. For I have sons
and I must toil in the hope that they and their children may have a greater
hope for freedom than do I. We must
work for those who will come after. It
is the hard work of beginning. It is
the hard work of repentance, of conversion, of turning back. We have traveled a long way down the path of
slavery to comfort and pleasure. We
cannot hope to jump immediately to the path of the freedom that only comes with
discipline. We must turn about and
begin to walk back the path we have journeyed so long until we find the fork in
the road. Then we will be faced with
the haunting specter of freedom. For,
though it may sound nice as truth resonates in man’s soul, the vision of the
thing is frightening to men who have become accustomed to ease and leisure and
irresponsibility. At that fork, we must
choose between the life of hard freedom or easy slavery. The former is befitting a true human nature
that we have long neglected and rebelled against. The latter is an atrocity against the Imago Dei, but one that we
have become quite accustomed to. Ought
we to choose the austere freedom of the sons of God or the luxurious servitude
of Mammon?
There is no
denying that the machine has been used by diabolical designs to achieve the
enslavement of so many men. As with all
the plots of hell, lies have been promoted to cloud the intellect. One of these I must address as it affects
the use of the machine, especially on the farm.
Those who
have put some hope in achieving independence on the land by the use of the
machine have given into an improper understanding of independence. They have been made to forget that no man is
an island. The would-be self-sufficient
homesteader finds himself in the midst of a society that highly esteems rugged
individualism. And yet, the members of
this society find themselves horribly dependent on an inhuman economic
system. So at one and the same time, we
pride ourselves in our independence and yet we are enslaved.
The answer
to this tangle of lies and injustice is not the collectivism of the
Marxists. That system has been tried
many times and has every time failed to produce anything truly human or
just. It certainly does not liberate
men from undignified slavery.
No, the
answer to both the rugged individualism of industrial capitalism and the rugged
collectivism of industrial communism is human community founded in truth,
founded in the social teaching of the Catholic Church.
The ideal
must not be the isolated homestead. The
ideal must be the village. It is not
good for man to be alone. He is made in
the image of the Triune God. He needs
the other so that he may be fully himself.
Interdependence is not slavery so long as every man is on equal footing
and charity reigns. The dairyman does
not lose his freedom for being dependent on the weaver, for the weaver is also
dependent on the dairyman. So long as
the dairyman could weave his own cloth and the weaver could get
his own cow or goat, they are not enslaving each other, but allowing community
to flourish. The village needs its
specialists, but even these specialists must be generalists. The carpenter cannot leave off all knowledge
of the soil as the farmer cannot leave off all knowledge of wood. And yet, they both know that there is only
so much time in a day, and in order to fulfill their more important duties to
their family and their own souls, they allow themselves to become
interdependent. In a way, this
interdependence is the fruit of charity as each knows that there are more
important things in life than what the senses can perceive and that these
unseen realities must be tended to – they must not be neglected.
If the
farmer must make all his own furniture and build his own barns in addition to
working his fields and tending his animals, there will be no time left over for
his family and, though he will have accomplished much, he will have failed his
family and his vocation – he will have failed life. If the carpenter must produce all his own food and fiber in
addition to his working with wood, he will be in the same predicament as the
overtaxed farmer. And if each member of
society acts thus, all will be turned in on themselves and will give no thought
to the other and will have no time for the other.
This is the
direction the machine points the would-be homesteader. It seeks to turn him in on himself to the
neglect of all others and to hide from him both the true and good need he has
of others as well as his own horrible, hidden slavery.
When men
were free, they freely gathered on each others’ farms to reap the harvest. When men were free, they freely gathered
together to thresh the grain and till the soil and raise barns. When men were free, they knew their
neighbors and depended on their neighbors.
When men were free, they took care of their own families and they took
care of each other. But with the
machine, free men traded their freedom for isolation and slavery.
I do not
mean to say that the machine is necessarily evil, nor do I mean to say that it
could not have turned out any way but thus.
But the reality is that it has turned out just thus and we must deal
with things as they are. I am reminded
more and more of Christ’s teaching, “If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off
and throw it away. For it is better
that you enter the kingdom of heaven with only one hand than to take both of
them with you into hell.”